|
Thread Review for Whisper of a thrill (newest post first)
|
|
Amor Fati
|
Posted on 2:59 am on Jan. 19, 2002
|
Ok Kris....
And Ile, good points you're making.
|
| |
|
Fallen
|
Posted on 5:52 pm on Jan. 18, 2002
|
I swear, I meant I must have misunderstood you.
Or no, I didn't. There are some things that I don't agree with in that. I'm not sure why. Maybe it's just my drunken happiness.
|
| |
|
Fallen
|
Posted on 5:48 pm on Jan. 18, 2002
|
Eh...we must have misunderstood you then.
|
| |
|
Glacialis
|
Posted on 5:41 pm on Jan. 18, 2002
|
If there's no more love, I think they should break up.
Otherwise, I think that if they wnat to try others, they should give the chance. I mean, that' not going to be anything permanent. I'd not have any problem with my partner trying others every once in a while if he/she'd giveme the same chance.
On the other hand, I'm damn drunk...
|
| |
|
Amor Fati
|
Posted on 3:21 pm on Jan. 18, 2002
|
|
What do you mean? Did you understand my question? I just said that if there's no love, they should break up. Isn't this the same thing you said?
|
| |
|
Fallen
|
Posted on 3:17 pm on Jan. 18, 2002
|
Why would you do that? What if they didn't love each other any longer? In my opinion, this would not a wonderful idea.
In any shape, matter, or form.
|
| |
|
Amor Fati
|
Posted on 9:35 am on Jan. 18, 2002
|
|
What makes man and women stay together? Besides love, I mean. Could you break up a couple that's been together for like 7 or 8 years, if the best rreason why they are still together is force of habit? Would somebody give up a comfortable relationship, based on something else, for a thrill which could become more? More than they have now? If it was up to me, I would make it so people could onl stay with the ones they love. Even if it would mean breaking up like 75% of the relationships in the world. I want the brain to be taken out of the ecuation.
|
| |
---(+ Holy Buffalo +)---
Post reply to